Victims of UK
'monster' breast surgeon demand truth
Victims of a British surgeon branded a "monster" for carrying out unnecessary mastectomies are calling for a full inquiry into how he was allowed to operate, after he was sentenced to 15 years in prison. Five hundred ex-patients of Ian Paterson are also seeking compensation from a private healthcare provider after he was convicted of "wounding with intent" and "unlawful wounding" of 10 women.
Victims of a British surgeon branded a "monster" for carrying out unnecessary mastectomies are calling for a full inquiry into how he was allowed to operate, after he was sentenced to 15 years in prison. Five hundred ex-patients of Ian Paterson are also seeking compensation from a private healthcare provider after he was convicted of "wounding with intent" and "unlawful wounding" of 10 women.
Charlie Massey, head of the General
Medical Council, said: "It is absolutely right that questions are asked
about how this happened and more crucially how the health system can prevent it
from happening again".
"His practice went unchecked for so
long because some of those in the health system, managers but also his
colleagues, had their concerns but failed to report them to us," he said
after the sentencing on Wednesday. Paterson was temporarily suspended over a
botched operation in 1996 at the Good Hope Hospital in Sutton Coldfield in
Birmingham in central England.
Further concerns were raised about him in
2003 but he was allowed to continue and was only suspended in 2012. "The
case has highlighted a gaping loophole in the justice system," Linda
Millband of Thompsons Solicitors, who represented many of the victims and is
behind a campaign called "Patients Before Profits", said in a
statement.
Dozens of victims and their relatives who
attended his sentencing at a court in Nottingham in central England spoke
emotionally about the trauma they had suffered from the life-changing surgery.
"I lost my home, I lost my marriage,
I lost my health, I lost my job, I lost absolutely everything," said Diane
Green, who underwent a controversial "cleavage-sparing mastectomy" by
Paterson. John Ingram, who also underwent surgery by Paterson for
"pre-cancer", said: "I'm still processing if I think 15 years is
enough for somebody who has shown no remorse, who has put his patients through
hell".
Judge Jeremy Baker said Paterson was
driven by his "own self-aggrandisement and the material rewards which it
brought from your private practice". "You deliberately played upon
their worst fears, either by inventing or deliberately exaggerating the risk
that they would develop cancer," he said.
The state-run National Health Service has
so far paid out £9.5 million (10.9 million euros, $12.2 million) in damages
following claims from nearly 800 of Paterson's patients, the Press Association
reported.
Paterson also practised at a series of
hospitals run by private healthcare provider Spire in the West Midlands area
where Birmingham is located. Spire apologised to Paterson's former patients for
the "distress experienced".
"Spire has been responding
responsibly and with all due urgency ever since these matters first came to
light and we would encourage all other parties to do the same," it said in
a statement.
0 Comments
Post a Comment