THE MAKING OF SCIENTIST
V.S. Ramachandran, India
The
essay ‘The Making of a Scientist’ is written by V.S Ramachandran. He also
research on scientific attitudes and students. He had got a chemistry lab
opened under his staircase. He has interested in the new subject matter and discovers
the things in the nature. He says his family also support to promote his
aspiration and interest to the field of physics. To encourage him, his father
had bought a microscope for him. Hence, one should be motivating family and
environment to be a scientist who is further supported when he claims the Victorian
era was the encouraging time which had produced the scientist like Darwin and
Huxley. The writer appreciates the importance of family background, school and
friends, teachers, colleagues and self interest in making of science is being
clarified by the writer. One can get success in his study and career especially
as a scientist when he gets the favorable environment and support from the
family and the society. There is very less to interpret than to assimilate in
The Making of a Scientist. Interpretation of the making of a scientist is very
less. In the field of science, exploration and stimuli are interrelated to each
other. The first and foremost requirement to be a scientist is the curiosity and
enthusiasm. H/she must have desire to know more even if an ends. One should be
ready to get and face the difficulties. Curiosity is something that does not
make someone comfort. Certain other qualities are required to be a scientist:
they are as follows: innate trait, associations, family can stimulate an
individual to be a scientist. In this way, ‘The Making of a Scientist’ is an
opinionated and descriptive essay based on his own experiences. The essay
describes the writer’s opinion of how a scientist can be mustered. The essay
focuses on how a scientist can be made by dealing with most significant
requirements for it. Scientist is eccentric people than others. So, their
interest, hobbies, environment should be something extra than those for normal
ones. To be a scientist one should be obsessively, passionately and
pathologically curious. As science is a subject of creations, freedom and independence,
people should understand that in the absence of anyone results in the failure
of innovations. The writer mentions that science develops innocence,
creativity, curiousness and passion in ones life.
Business English
B.B.S First Year
0 Comments
Post a Comment